A reference assistant that provides source-linked answers on court practice related to open data disputes.
Case-based analysis + argument excerpts
Link to the product:
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8e9dddc6-048c-4d89-aa27-b6e84e2bb117
What it does
- Curates court decisions and expert materials on open data litigation - Loads sources into a question–answer interface - Returns plain-language answers grounded in specific rulings - Provides direct links to cited decisions and passages - Allows users to explore arguments used in comparable cases
Problem context
When public bodies deny access to open data, practitioners struggle to quickly identify relevant case law and proven legal arguments. Existing court registries are difficult to navigate and do not support comparative or question-driven analysis.
What it is NOT
- Provide legal advice - Predict court outcomes - Replace professional legal analysis - Generate original legal opinions
Current use / deployment status
- Publicly accessible and used by journalists, lawyers, NGOs, and civic-tech teams - Applied in preparation of legal complaints, articles, and advocacy materials - Maintained as a reference implementation for open-data enforcement
Known limitations
- Coverage depends on curated court decisions and materials - Answers are limited to available sources - Jurisdictional scope is currently focused on Ukraine